Wasn't Ephraim Divorced
Forever?
. . . backsliding Israel [House
of Ephraim] hath justified herself more than [the] treacherous [House of]
Judah. Go and proclaim these words toward the north, and say, Return,
thou backsliding Israel [Ephraim], saith the Lord, and I will not cause mine
anger to fall upon you; for I am merciful, saith the Lord, and I will not
keep anger forever ... For I am married unto you.
(Jeremiah 3:11-15)
Shalom Rav Moshe:
I have just read this
article on Dr. Siberlings and came across this reference toJer
3:11-15. I canot find where it states "for I am married unto
you"in these verses. In fact in Jer 3:8 it states: "And I saw that
for all the causes for which backsliding Yisra'el (Ephraim) had committed
adultery, I had put her away and given her a certificate of
divorce;" YHWH has divorced Ephraim, they are not under covenant,
however Judah is still under covenant.
Patricia
Shalom Patricia,
Your comments about no covenant for Ephraim couldn't be more wrong. That
situation was temporal until the New Covenant came along. Jer 31:31-32 states in
the clearest possible terms, that the New Covenant would be cut with both houses
thus making it a covenant covering and recommitment of Yah's love to outcast
Israel.
Rabbi Moshe
Shalom Rabbi:
The first point I
was actually making was that it does not say "for I am married to you"
in Jer 3:11-15 This statement is not in these scriptures - just making a
correction. The second point was about Ephraim being divorced - and I don't know
yet if I can agree with you that it was "temporal." The covenant was
cut with both houses but YHWH divorced
Ephraim. Shalom
Patricia
You are right about
the word "marriage," it is not in the text and he should not have used
it. This will be my final response due to my time constraints. What you are
claiming is both a logical and historical absurdity. Jeremiah prophecies that
the House of Israel, aka Ephraim, would enter into a "New Covenant"
thus commencing Israel's regathering. This prophecy is about 150 years after the
supposed divorce. Yahweh does not prophecy a covenant which in its very essence
is a marriage contract with Ephraim 150 years after he supposedly divorced
Ephraim, without intending to rescue them.
Further and finally
in Jeremiah 31:19-20, Yahweh states that "for though I spoke against him I
still remembered him" and in verse 9 of Jeremiah 31, Yahweh states that 150
years after this supposed divorce Ephraim was STILL HIS FIRSTBORN. Hosea 8:11
Yahweh states "how can I give you up Ephraim how could I hand you over
Israel", then in verse 9 in the clearest possible terms, he states despite
punishment that he will NOT DESTROY EPHRAIM.
Patricia, I think
where you are getting confused is in the difference between Hosea 1:4 and Hosea
1:10-11. As a nation or kingdom v. 4 of Hosea 1, they are destroyed never to be
a nation again. As individuals they are not destroyed but rescued by Messiah as
they appoint Messiah to be their head along with Judah (Hosea 1:11) in the day
of Jezreal or the ingathering of the scattered seed. Verse 10 of Hosea 1 talks
of them as individuals becoming children of Yahweh.
Keep studying!
Shalom
DEFENDING JERRY KEYES
THE "
CHOFETZ CHAYIM " IN HIS BOOK ON THE HOW TO USE OUR TONGUE AND QUOTING
FROM THE BOOK OF PROVERBS, SAYS: "
WE HAVE IN OUR LIPS THE POWER OF LIFE AND
DEATH."
TORAH
EXPLICITLY WARNS US AGAINST GOSSIP AND AGAINST USING LASHON HARAH,
THAT IS OF USING ANY UNKIND AND
DESTRUCTIVE SPEECH AGAINST A BROTHER.
I HAPPEN TO
KNOW MY FRIEND OF MANY YEARS , RABBI JERRY KEYES... JERRY WAS
MY TALMID
FOR A NUMBER YEARS, WHEN HE USED TO TRAVEL FROM OCALA TO TAMPA, FOR
A BIT OF INSTRUCTION . I VOUCH FOR HIS
LOVE AND KINDNESS TOWARDS ALL MEN.
I ALSO VALUE ALL MY FRIENDS OF THE MJAA,
AN ORGANIZATION THAT I WAS HONORED
TO HAVE SERVED FOR ABOUT 20 YEARS,
BOUTH AS MEMBER OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTE,
AS VICRE PRESIDENT AND PRESIDENT. IT IS A GOD ORDAINED ORGANIZATION. A
MARK OF A TRUE TZADIK, IS A MAN WHO USED HIS TONGUE VERY CAREFULLY AND
WHO PRACTICES
WHAT PIRKEY ABBOT TELLS US; OSE
MEOD U DAVER LEAT. DO MUCH AND SAY VERY LITTLE. LONG
AGO, RABBI YEHUDA THE PRINCE ( HANASI ) USED TO SAY: THERE
ARE THREE THINGS, WHICH IF A MAN OBSERVES , WILL KEEP HIS SOUL FROM
SIN. THOSE THREE ARE: 1.
THE ALL SEEING EYE. 2. THE
ALL HEARING EAR. 3. KNOWING
THAT ALL OUR DEEDS ARE WRITTEN IN THE BOOK OF LIFE. OF
COURSE YAHSHUA PUT IT THIS WAY BLESSED
ARE THE PEACE MAKERS, BECAUSE THEY SALL BE KNOWN AS CHILDREN OF GOD.
MATT 5:9
MARSHALL:
THOUGH MUST OF US DO NOT AGREE WITH MRS
WOOTEN AND YOU REGARDING YOUR EPHARIM
THEOLOGY, WE WILL NOT USE UNKIND WORDS OVER THE INTERNET AGAINST ANY
OF YOU. I
HAVE KNOWN MRS WOOTEN SINCE THE LATE 70'S AND THOUGH I BELIEVE THAT HER
IDEAS ARE NOT BIBLICAL, THAT IS AS FAR
AS I GO. SHE IS A VERY FINE LADY. AS
FOR YOU MARSHALL, I CAME TO KNOW YOU DURING MY EFFORST TO TRY TO PLACE
YOU AS AN ASSITANT RABBI WITH RABBI
PAUL GHENASIA, AT BETH EL BET EL IN
PARIS, FRANCE.
RABBI
HAIM LEVI
Chaim,
My name of birth is
Moshe. I will be happy to send you a copy of my birth certificate. Unlike many
messianic rabbis who have to find a Jewish name, I was born with one and had the
pagan name placed upon me by a employer who felt Marshall was better for
business! So I would appreciate you referring to me by me true name. I did not
know that you were on my e mail list, because I do not want to place anyone
there that does not want to be there. I will be happy to remove you.
As far as Jerry
Keyes, your description of him does not fit the description of him by hundreds
who know him well, whose very lives have been ruined, with some of the most vile
and obscene behaviors having been verified as his doing. He has personally lied
to me and my wife as well! Furthermore Jerry Keyes has shown exactly what kind
of spirit he operates under, by mocking a major biblical doctrine held and
respected by millions of Jews and non-Jews worldwide, including the
talmudists you mentioned. He did this at a major event held by a major
organization. He dressed up like a train conductor and made train noises for 20
minutes in his ill fated attempt to mock, ridicule and belittle the two house
truth. He did this publicly and thus shamed himself, his organization and his
movement. Thus what was reported actually did take place and was not Lashon
Harah since Lashon Harah is evil or falsehoods against another. These posts were
neither evil nor false.
They were a report
of a pathetic presentation, by a veteran well know messianic Jewish leader
designed to ridicule and belittle other messianic brethren!
Now I see the MJAA
is so embarrassed by this childish incident, that they have others trying to
cover the unclean footprints and PR damage, left by this recent conference. Now
by coincidence I happen to hear from you after several years. As for your
comments about untrue doctrine, I take them with a grain of salt, especially in
light of the fact that you purposely misquoted Genesis 48:19 to Mordecahi
Silver. The term "Ephraimite Doctrine" is a misnomer not taught by me
or anyone else and is in itself Lashon Harah against me my brother. The proper
theme and name for Israel's 12 tribe restoration is the two houses and I suggest
you honor us by referring to it as that, not by an anti-Semitic name of your
invention. This is what the anti-Semitic practices of the MJAA are. They falsely
label our teachings "The Ephraimite Doctrine." Where or when have any
of us in Messianic Nazarene Yisrael used that term. If we didn't and someone else is, by
using it you are identifying with that element of messianism that is involved in
slander and not in a search for truth.
Let me remind you
that the ten tribes while not being Jewish are sons of Israel through Shem, thus
rejecting their claim in Israel is anti-Semitism, as much as it would be by
telling a Jew that he was not a Jew! Torah teaches that anyone crazy enough who
desires to permanently sojourn with us through circumcision and Pesach
fellowship, becomes Israel (not a Jew), forever and forever. That is what Torah
teaches. It is not what Messianic Judaism teaches however, Rabbi Levi as for me
and my house, we will serve Yahweh and his guidelines for citizenship in Israel.
Not man's!!!
Over 50 messianic
Jewish rabbis now openly teach the ongoing two house restoration and have made
it a mainstay of their ministry because they are open minded to what scripture
teaches. We do not teach "The Ephraimite Doctrine", rather we teach
exactly what Raschi, Abarbanel and Onkolos taught. Namely that Joseph or Ephraim
became gentiles through massive and unprecedented assimilation, until the
revelation to themselves and to Judaism of who they really were. That revelation
would take place according to our sages in the yamim acharonim (last days).
Thus Rabbi Levi your
opinion is not scriptural, talmudic or historical, but it is certainly Messianic
Jewish. It is hard for you to kick against the goads and I would encourage you
to study this matter until you are ready to join us in all of Israel's
restoration, not just the part recognizable to the 5 senses.
Shalom
Rabbi Moshe Koniuchowsky
CIRCUMCISION FORBIDDEN?
Shalom Rabbi Moshe;
I thank you for your
reply on the Feasts of Yahweh. I am trying to understand so that I may teach, so
I hope you don't mind a few questions. I would draw your attention to Galatians
5:1-8. I of course do not wish to put any hindrances on anyone that would keep
them from coming to the knowledge of Yahshua HaMashiach. I try to understand. If
in verses 3 & 4, this is in fact what Paul talks about in trying to
understand and obey Jewish customs and laws. Can you please help me to
understand and clarify this in my own mind? Please excuse me if I have said
something to offend, as this is not my intent.
Pastor James Wolfe
Jr.
Valley Christian Ministries Harrison, Ohio
Pastor Jim,
The circumcision Rav
Shaul forbids, is not the penis which is the eternal token to all the male
Israelite offspring of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, rather he forbids
non-Israelites from being or becoming or converting to the nation of the
circumcision, as a prerequisite for salvation. In other words the Galatian
heresy was that Jewish believers were telling non-Israelites that THEY WERE NOT
OR COULD NEVER BE SAVED BY FAITH ALONE, without an outward act of physical
circumcision, or physically becoming Jews via conversion! This was and still is
heresy and is addressed by Rav Shaul, since the gospel is to "whosoever
will." To prove that this is the correct application, Rav Shaul would be a
major hypocrite, if he told non-Israelite believers not to be penis circumcised,
when he himself physically circumcised Timothy, who was not an Israelite in Acts
16:1-3. Therefore if he did what he supposedly told the Galatians not to do,
then he was a hypocrite who did not write under inspiration. Since you and I
know that not to be the case, it must be our initial misunderstanding of what he
is teaching, that lies as the problem. He forbids circumcision, to Judaism i.e.
conversion and reaffirmed that conviction in 1st Corinthians. 7. He would never
and did not ever forbid penis circumcision to Timothy, who was a non-Israelite
based on having a Greek father. Hope that helps! Let me know what you want me to
do with those books.
Dear Rabbi,
I just today
discovered your website and am thankful that I have. For a couple of days I have
had great confusion sweep over me and decided to pray to Yahweh, instead of
referring to Him as Lord, or God as I had been. Today many of the answers, which
I had been seeking, came via your website. I especially like your series
"The Full Restoration of Israel", as this is what I had been thinking
from my own studies. Although not fleshed out as you have done it, due to the
fact that I have been doing most of my studying with no help. A lot of people
who I try to share some of my findings with simply think I am nuts (maybe your
well written series will open their eyes)! I found your message board and found
the exact answer to another question, which I had been praying about. I just
wanted to tell you thank you. I have felt deep in my heart that I was an
Israelite of the lost tribes. Your study clarified that and also helped with a
few things that I could not grasp. Just wanted to let you know. Thank you so
much for a very enlightening site. Sorry this is so long. In Sincerity,
Judy Riggs.
Parts Unknown
Dear Rabbi Moshe,
I am a believer in
Yahshua. I have read almost everything on your website. Your "two
house" theology is something I had never heard of before. As I studied the
Scriptures along side your teachings I began to sense that I was in fact a long
lost blood relative to Jews, an "Ephraimite Israelite." I wasn't quite
satisfied that the Bible actually stood for "replacement" theology, or
dispensationalism. Then I came across your teachings. I must say, I was
completely astounded. However, as I continued investigating and studying, I came
across something called "British-Israelism" or
"Anglo-Israelism." After studying the history of this movement, I
began to wonder why I had not seen anything about this in your teachings.
As I am sure you are
well aware, early on this century Herbert W. Armstrong took this bull by the
horns and ran with it. He is now deceased, and his Worldwide Church of God in
1995 recanted the "Anglo-Israelitism" doctrines. The Seventh-Day
Adventists have also latched on to the "Anglo-Israelitism" bandwagon
and I believe they are still on board with it.
My question is why
haven't you addressed this more directly, in your teachings? If uncovering the
true identity of the lost Ephraimite/Israelites is of paramount importance, why
have you not at least addressed the history of this movement in Great Britain
and in the U.S. in order to help those who are already familiar with
"Anglo-Israelitism?" It seems to me that any sincere truth seeker
would not accept your teachings, without much study and prayer and this is what
I have been doing, as the Bereans did so long ago. And in the course of my
studies of the Scriptures and church history, I came across this movement. How
is your teaching not just another modern manifestation of "Anglo-Israelitism?"
How is what you are saying anything different from the off base and now debunked
views of Herbert W. Armstrong (and the rest of "Anglo-Israelitism")? I
would very much like for you to address this issue by personal reply to this
e-mail. If not I'll assume the point is not worth spending time or energy on,
but I have to say, that would leave your teaching quite suspect in my eyes.
Seeking the Truth,
Matt Redard
Shalom Matt,
It is great that you
have written. I have just completed an extensive teaching showing the clear
differences between Anglo-Israelism and the two houses as Yahshua Himself taught
it. You are holding it in your hands! I agree with you that this teaching has
been a long time coming and needed for many different reasons including
clarification! Shalom!
Dear Friend,
The scripture that
you sighted, in the article that you sent this morning (Part Six), Second Samuel
7:10 and First Chronicles 17:9, are taking about King David and his son
Solomon's kingdom being established forever. The Kingdom of Yahweh a.k.a.
David's Kingdom, was established in his son Solomon, has never lacked a man to
sit on his throne, just as He decreed. The throne ceased to exist with Zedekiah
in the land of Judah. However Yahweh's promise to David was not annulled by this
overturn. All of Zedekiah's male offspring were either destroyed or castrated so
that at least Satan hoped that David's heir would be destroyed. But Yahweh
always keeps His word and he preserved a princess who emerged with a prince of
the lineage of Zarah, who was seated in the midst of Israel. Israel had migrated
to Ireland then to Scotland and then to England/Wales and can be traced directly
from David through Solomon. Yes just as the Father promised the throne of David
is alive and well on planet earth and soon the Messiah will return and take it
back. But before that happens there will be once again a great martyrdom of all
Sabbath keeping people. The main thing is for all of us to have our armor of the
word of Yahweh around us and our Sword sharp and oil in our lamps for the times
just ahead of us.
Ethel Cody
Parts Unknown
Dear Ethel,
I pray that after
digesting the things I most truthfully shared in this month's teaching after
months of personal research, that you now are able to see and receive the
correction that is needed in your thinking. That is my prayer for you!
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________ |