I saw these questions arise at a forum. I could not, in good conscience, say nothing. The following is the post I made, minus the original posters name. His questions are in bold.

 

 

"Should the laws of man outlaw the laws of Yahweh? Should a rightious man in a rightious house have the right/responsibility to 'correct' his wife, even if he uses violence? According to Scripture, is the state responsible for the relationships between a man and his wife? Is there any Scriptual justification for state interference in the relationship of a man and his wife? In Scripture, is it justified for a man to beat his wife? In Scripture, can a man kill his child? If so, for what reasons? Please answer from Scripture - No toutchy, touchy feel good 60's BS....”

 

First, I would like to ask some questions? You ask if the laws of men should outweigh the laws of YHWH, in direct relationship to a post titled, "Domestic violence/just wondering." You follow your question with another question, which reads more like a statement by your choice of words; asking if a righteous man in a righteous house, having the right/responsibility to  "correct" his wife, even if he uses violence. So my questions are, do you view violence toward your wife, as a means of "correction"? Do you somehow think that it is a law of YHWH to beat a wife? Are you asking for some kind of justification to beat a wife? Or kill a child? I am appalled by these questions and the way in which they are worded.

 

 

Malakiy 2:13-17, " 'And this a second thing you do, covering with tears the altar of YHWH, with weeping and groaning, yet He does not face toward the food offering, or receives it with delight from your hand. Yet you say, "Why?" Because YHWH has been a witness between you and the ishshah of your youth, whom you have broken faith against her, and she, your companion, and your ishshah of your covenant.  Did He not make echad [united/one]? And the remnant of the Ruach is in him. And what of the one? He is seeking a  seed of elohiym. So guard your ruach, and with the ishshah of your youth do not break faith.  "For I hate divorce," says YHWH, elohey of Yisrael, "and to cover with violence, as his garment," says YHWH Tsebaoth. So guard  your ruach, and do not deal treacherously. You have wearied YHWH with your words, yet you say, "In what have we wearied Him?"  In your saying,  "Every evil-doer is good in the eyes of YHWH. And in them He delights," and, "Where is the elohey of justice?' "

 

Amazing that YHWH would speak of a man covering himself with violence as he does a garment, in the same passage as hating divorce and dealing treacherously with the wife of your marriage covenant, and then say to guard yourself in your ruach.

 

That word, violence, is chamas; treat violently, wrong, injure, cruelty, damage, oppress, mistreat.

 

YirmeYahu 22:3, "So says YHWH, 'Do justice and righteousness, and deliver the one robbed from the oppressor's hand. And do not oppress the ger, the widow or the orphan and do no violence, nor shed innocent blood in this place.' " If YHWH gives this command concerning those that might be considered outcasts and more susceptible to violence, how much more understood is it, to do no violence to your own ishshah that you are to be echad with?

 

Thehillah [Psalm] 11:5, "YHWH tries the righteous, but His nefesh hates the wicked, and him who loves violence."

 

Thehillah 73:6, of those that are wicked and proud, "So pride is their necklace; violence covers like a garment belonging to them."

 

Another passage, like Malakiy 2, that speaks of what comes between you and YHWH, is YeshaYahu [Isaiah] 59:6, "Their webs will not become clothing, nor will they cover themselves with their works. Their works are works of evil, and the act of violence is in their hands."

 

These violent men, instead of clothing themselves with the garment of righteousness, have chosen violence.

 

What makes you think that violence is a means of correcting your wife? Mishley [Proverbs] 12:10, "The righteous knows the nefesh of his beast, but the mercies of the wicked are cruel."  How much more should the truly righteous know his ishshah? How many wives could say that the mercies of their husbands were cruel?

 

Also, show me where in the Tanak, that YHWH says to use a rod to  "correct" an ishshah, or the palm of you hand or your fist or some other instrument? No where does YHWH teach or direct anything like that  in the Scriptures.

 

Shemoth [Exodus] 21: verses 18-27 speak of injuries to one another,  men against men, owners against slaves, etc. The injuries are to be paid for, and a slave could be set free if an eye or a tooth was lost. Can a wife, who is of much greater value and position than a slave, one who an iysh is supposed to be echad with, be set free from a marriage if damage is done to her from her husband? The damage should not even be done to a wife.

 

In YeshaYahu [Isaiah] 58, YHWH speaks of what  a true fast is,  pointing out that they could not fast as they were doing and expect their voice to be heard. One of the things mentioned, that caused them not to be heard, was the striking of each other with their fists of wickedness. Did YHWH say, "except those of you that beat your wives, that is okay, in fact it is a right and a responsibility to correct your wives with violence. Your fast I will acknowledge." ?  I think not.

 

In I Shmuel 25, you read of a man named Nabal, who the Tanak lists, in verse 3, as being cruel and evil in his dealings. Verse 15 says that Nabal screamed at the messengers sent by Dawiyd, to request supplies. Verse 17 says that he is a son of worthlessness and no one can talk to him. Abiygayil had to go against her husbands wishes, in order to protect them from slaughter and did not even tell him. She says in verse 25, that he is rightly named and foolishness is with him. When Abiygayil gets back, Nabal is feasting and drunk, so she did not tell him until morning, that she had taken supplies to Dawiyd and his men. YHWH strikes Nabal with a heart attack and he dies 10 days later. Dawiyd said that YHWH had caused the evil doing of Nabal to come back on his head.

 

Nowhere does it say that Nabal beat his wife, but given the description of his character, his cruelty, his temper, his drunkenness, his reputation by his servants and his wife, it is not only possible, it is probable that she was the recipient of his cruelty as well. And YHWH struck Nabal and delivered Abiygayil from such a husband.

 

 

"According to Scripture, is the state responsible for the relationships between a man and his wife? Is there any Scriptual justification for state interference in the relationship of a man and his wife?"

 

According to the Scriptures, those in authority, which in the case of Israel, was first and foremost YHWH, then it was the kohaniym and the king. A good example of this, applying to the husband/wife relationship is in BeMidbar [Numbers] 5:11-31.

 

" And YHWH spoke to Mosheh, saying,   'speak to the sons of Yisrael,  and you will say to them, when an ishshah of any man turns aside,  and unfaithfully, against him is unfaithful and a man lies with her,  seed, and it has been hidden from the eyes of her iysh, and concealed,  and she has been defiled, and there is no witness against her, and she has not been caught,   and a ruach of jealousy passes over him, and he has been jealous of his ishshah, and she has been defiled; or, a ruach of jealousy passes over him, and he has been jealous of his ishshah,  and she has not been defiled,  then the man will bring in his ishshah,  to the kohen, and he will bring in her offering for her, a tenth of the ephah of barley meal, he will not pour on it oil, nor will he put on it frankincense, for it  is an offering of jealousy, an offering of memorial,  causing remembrance of iniquity.  And the kohen will bring her near,  and will cause her to stand before YHWH,  and the kohen will take set apart water, in an earthen vessel, and of the dust, which is on the floor of the mishkan, the kohen will take, and put, into the water,  and the kohen will cause the woman to stand before YHWH, and will uncover the head of the woman, and will give to her hands, the offering of the memorial,  an offering  of jealousy, and in the hand of the kohen are the bitter waters which cause the curse.  And the kohen will cause her to swear, and will say to the woman, ‘if no man has lain with you, and if you have not turned aside, uncleanness under your iysh, be free from these bitter waters which cause the curse;  and you, if you have turned aside under your iysh, and if you have been defiled, and any man has given his seed to you besides your iysh,’  then the kohen will cause the woman to swear with an oath of cursing, and the kohen will say to the woman, ‘YHWH gives you for a cursing, and for a curse, in the midst of your people, in YHWH's giving  your thigh to fall, and your belly to swell,  and these waters which cause the curse will  go into your bowels, to cause the belly to swell, and the thigh to fall.’ And the woman will say, ‘amen, amen.’  And the kohen will write these curses in a book, and will blot  out with the bitter waters,  and will cause the woman to drink the bitter waters which cause the curse, and the waters which cause the curse will enter into her for bitter things.  And the kohen will take out of the hand of the ishshah, the offering of jealousy, and will wave the offering before YHWH, and will bring it near to the altar;  and the kohen will take a handful of the offering, its memorial, and will make incense on the altar, and afterwards  cause the ishshah to drink the water:   he will cause her to drink the water, and it will come to pass, if she has been defiled, and did commit a trespass against her iysh, that the waters which cause the curse will go into her for bitter things, and her belly will swell,  and her thigh will fall, and the ishshah will become a cursing in the midst of her people.  And if the ishshah has not been defiled, and is clean, then she will be acquitted, and will be sown seed.  This is the thorah of jealousies, when an ishshah turns aside under her iysh, and has been defiled,  or when a ruach of jealousy passes over an iysh,  and he has been jealous of his ishshah, then he will cause the ishshah to stand before YHWH, and the kohen will do to her all this thorah,  and the iysh will be acquitted from iniquity, and that ishshah will bear her iniquity. “

 

This is clearly a case, that shows a man cannot take matters, between he and his wife, into his own hands, and has to submit to the authorities in the matter. He cannot beat her or kill her, just because he believes something and has no witness, but a suspicion.

 

Also it was the responsibility of the assembly to hear matters and to judge on them. Violence is not equated with righteousness, why would the case of a husband beating a wife, be any different than that of one man against another? YHWH does not lift up violent men, regardless of who the violence is directed to. It is a sad testimony of those that call themselves believers to have the state have to intervene, for the protection of a wife, because of the husbands  "correcting".  Now you can say that the state would have no right to do so. You could also state that about your own personal and business disagreements, yet the Tanak and the Testimony, both show the intervention of the secular governments in those cases as well. The Letters even say that situations should be dealt with between believers and if it gets to the point that it goes secular, that it is a bad reflection on the body that they could not handle their own situations.

 

Now, since you did not specify Tanak only, as the Scriptures, or if you view the Testimony, Letters and Revelations as Scripture as well, I will add those passages, from the Peshitta.

 

Ephesians 5:25-33, "Husbands, love your wives, even as HaMashiyach  loved his assembly, and delivered his nefesh up for her. That He might set apart her, and cleanse her, by the washing of the waters, and in the word. And might make her an assembly for himself, being honored, in which is no stain, and no wrinkle, and nothing like them;  but that it might be set apart and without blemish. It becomes men to love their wives, as their own bodies. For he that loves his ishshah loves himself. For no one ever hated his own body; but nourishes it, and provides for it, even as HaMashiyach the assembly. For we are members of His body and of His flesh, and of His bones. For this reason, an iysh should leave his father and his mother, and cling to his ishshah; and the two should be one [echad-united] flesh. This is a great mystery; but I am speaking of HaMashiyach, and of His assembly. Nevertheless, let each of you so love his ishshah, even as himself, and let the ishshah reverence her iysh."

 

Now this quite clearly speaks of a relationship between an iysh and an ishshah. It does not say for the iysh to violently correct his ishshah,  but it gives the example of Yahusha` caring for the assembly in love,  and the example of  treating your own body. Do you beat yourself when you correct yourself? Do you commit violence against yourself?

 

I Timothy 3 - these are the standards of an zaqen [elder], "And a zaqen should be such, that no blame can be found in him; and he should be the baal [master] of one ishshah, with a prudent mind, and modest and self controlled , and loving to strangers, and able to teach; and not a drunkard of wine, and not his hand  quick to strike; but he should be humble, and not an uproarous iysh, nor a lover of silver; and one that rules well his own house, and holds his children in obedience with all purity. For if he knows not how to rule his own house well, how can he rule the assembly of elohiym? Neither let him be  young in learning; otherwise he be uplifted, and fall into the judgement of HaSatan. And there ought to be good testimony of him from those without; otherwise he will fall into reproach and the snare of HaSatan."

 

Well that seems to disqualify Nabal.

 

A similar list is in Titus 1:6-9, again mentioning that a zaqen should not be quick to strike, which does not mean to do it slowly.

 

Throughout the Letters, there are lists of those who cannot enter the kingdom of YHWH. Common to most of the lists, are those that have no self control, are abusive, exhibit rage, brawling, anger, and are brutal, any one of which could very easily define what men might call  "correcting" their wives with violence. I think the bigger question here is not just if a husband had the right to do violence to his wife, but if a person has the right to do violence to another. I am not speaking of correctly disciplining your child with a rod, I am speaking of violence. I don’t see that it is righteous for any man or woman to be violent to another, especially to your spouse. It is as the verse in Yaaqob [James] 1:19,20, " ' and you, my beloved brethren, let every one of you be swift to hear, and slow to speak, and slow to be angry; for the wrath of man the righteousness of elohiym works not.' "